Gordon Brown's Economics

Yesterday, Gordon Brown announced "The Road to the London Summit, the Plan for Recovery." Apart of this document is the plan to set up an international board on the regulations of banks around the world. This board was questioned by the ABC News member of the press core. The response of PM Gordon Brown was to be lacking, as in he dodged the question all together. Brown's program would allow an international body of bankers to control all Federal and Private banks in the United States.

What does this have to do with Constitutional Thinking? President Obama is an international socialist, rated as the most leftist member of Congress in 2007. Obama is less than likely to "preserve... the Constitution of the United States" by fighting against an international regulation and internationalizing of the banking systems of the United States designed (according to Gordon Brown) to prevent American Banks from fleeing Europe (specifically Eastern Europe) in order to put domestic problems first. His overall stance on this initiative is as follows according to the Official White House agenda,

"To build an economy that can lead this future, we will begin to rebuild America. Yes, we’ll put people to work repairing crumbling roads, bridges, and schools by eliminating the backlog of well-planned, worthy and needed infrastructure projects. But we’ll also do more to retrofit America for a global economy."
(Italics added for emphasis)

Barrack Obama views the "retrofit" of the American towards a globalization as the infrastructure of the country, in the same light as roads, schools, and bridges. The Constitution, however, does not share this same view. On the contrary, the Tenth Amendment, which state, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Due to the fact that banking regulation was not mentioned as a power of Congress under the First Article, the President under the Second Article, or the Judiciary under the Third Article, nor prohibited by the States under the Fourth Article; this power is given to the States, and not President Obama. The only Constitutional way that Obama would have the power to achieve this "retro fitting" is by a Constitutional Amendment giving the President the power to achieve this "retro fitting." It is safe to say that this proposal for G20 this year in London will be approved by Obama as an executive agreement between the United States and the World in order to "retro fit" the American economy with the Global Economic Unity projects of Europe, the Far Left, and the Neo-Conservative Movement (which ironically began under the popular President Bush). However, it is a matter of precedence, dating back to John Adams, for Presidents to ignore the Constitution and the Judiciary, dating back to John Marshal, to ignore the Presidential abuse.



Sources

1. http://www.voanews.com/english/2009-02-18-voa38.cfm
2. http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.2490170.0.Brown_unveils_economic_plan_for_recovery_within_months.php
3. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/19/gordon-brown-apology
4. http://www.whitehouse.gov/agenda/economy/
5. http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html
6. C-SPAN presentation of Gordon Brown monthly address of the British Economy (2 - 19 - 09)
7. The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History written by Dr. Thomas Woods (Ph.D in American History)
8. The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Constitution written by Dr. Kevin R.C. Gutzman (J.D. and Ph.D in American History)
   

My Message to Our President

We the People have been watching,
After you have finished talking,
And waving to the people,
That might as be sheeple.
Yes we can permute.

And after the time is done,
And rhetoric opens from
The pain of lost complacency,
And the country will be angry.
Yes we can endure.

When public opinion falters
Will the face change alter,
Or will you be the Sumter
And face the enemy without slumber.
Yes we can live on.

Will you drive out the elite,
And take out the deceit.
Or will you an equivalent,
And increase their benevolence.
Yes we can struggle.

In the end, your oratory
Must be backed by activity.
Not leading the sheep away,
But through the straight and narrow way.
Yes we can resolve.

------------------------------------------------------------

You have one strike against you, Mr. President Obama.

You are destroying the lives of children by supporting and immoral and uncivil practice that will murder the lives of hundreds of children, everyday.

Not only in our country, but around the world.

Veto your own illegal legislation, on government sponsored abortions!

Barrack Obama isn't a Fascist.

Obama has been labeled a fascist incorrectly. Many Americans believe, after the strange youtube videos that have been popping up of an "Obama Youth" that he is the next Hitler.

I would have to argue that he isn't a Fascist. State Socialism (lets not forget that Hitlers political party was a State Socialist Party) emphasizes the state as supreme, even above all foreign powers. They view themselves as superiors in every way.

Why?

Simply because they are Germans, or they are Americans, or they are Spanish, or they are Italians. There is little rationale other than there ethnicity or state.

Obama is different.

He want's the nation to be proud that America is apart of the Global Community. Remember his speech in Germany. Obama is for Germany as much as he is for America. That is not Fascism. It is International Socialism, or Communism.

The only thing standing in his, and others like-minded, way is a few (possibly only one) Senators and Reps (And no: John McCain is not the Senator I am referring to).

The fact of the matter is, there is few choices. The Republicans have became increasingly Liberal, the Democrats have switch there position as a party so much that the people that have worked and founded it (Jefferson and Jackson among others) would be shocked by it.

I would have to say that Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr are the best choices. I am voting for Chuck Baldwin.

Barrack Obama and John McCain will RAISE your taxes!

Hello everyone,

Today I am going to state the obvious. John McCain and Barrack Obama will raise your taxes. Despite there ads, speeches, and overall campaign, they will both be another four years of Bush...


...Sr.

They both will raise your taxes, they both will increase spending, they both will lead America into the next depression. It is an economic fact that they cannot ignore.

According to the Austrian School of Economics, there is only three ways to increase the national "wealth." One is by borrowing. This is unlikely because we have already borrowed billions. The other two are taxes. The fist of these is a direct raising of taxes. This might not happen. If it doesn't the only way that Barrack Obama and John McCain could pay for there "plans" is by increasing the money supply. This is the INFLATION TAX. This tax devalues your currency. It is because of inflation that gas prices are high; the dollar is simply not worth what it used to be.

There are only two presidential candidate with some economic sense; Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution Party and Bob Barr of the Libertarian Party. They will not increase any of the taxes because they have plans to decrease spending. They understand economics. Of these two,



Chuck Baldwin has my vote.


Also, become a "reader" today. Click the link on the right panel.
Thanks

The Presidentual Elections

The Presidentual Elections are in full swing. This past month, many things have occured which require us all to look at the canadates, and pick the proper one. I know that many have said this before, but, this election is monumental. It can change the face of the country as we know it. A friend of mine told me, "This election will determine the langague our children will learn in schools." I don't know if he is right, but it is not improbable.

Here is how I, a Ron Paul supporter, place the Canadates.

1: Chuck Baldwin
I know a lot of people don't know of him, but he is very similar if not a clone of Ron Paul. He is running on the Constitution Party Ticket and is from Flordia. He is a friend of Ron Paul.

2: Bob Barr
This is more due to the people he might put in power. The fact is, he is as Libertarian as the current President. It is a sad thing, but true.

3: Abstain
I know what you are thinking, "This isn't a canadate." You are right, it isn't. This is there simply to show how bad the next canadates are. If you vote for them, you might as well not voted.

4: John McCain
He is one of the two liberals running for the presidency. His running mate is Sarah Palian and he is pro-War, anti-Market. Not a friend to the Constitution, John McCain feels that the president has the right to declare war and create laws.

5:Cynthia McKenney
She is anti-constitution candidate, there is nothing left to say.

6:Gloria La Riva
A Communist. Hates capitalism. Love Castro.

7:Barrack Obama
A Communist. Whats to "change" the country into a Marxist superstate. Biden is his v.p. yet he feels Obama is "unfit" for the job. If the vp thinks that the person is unfit, than why vote for them?

*sorry for any third parties that aren't here.

Economics will continue soon.

thanks for reading.